Tag Archives: Homestead Act

Happy Homestead Act anniversary

Exactly 150 years ago today, Abraham Lincoln signed the Homestead Act into law.  This act permitted applicants to claim ownership of undeveloped federal land at no cost, fulfilling the vision of Free Soilers who wanted to settle the frontier with free farmers rather than slaveowners.  Before this date, pro-slavery politicians had blocked passage of such an act in an attempt to preserve the ability of the peculiar institution to spread westward, but the secession of the South and the rise of a Republican Congress removed this impediment to a free American West.

Author Fergus Bordewich has some reflections on this important anniversary at The Wall Street Journal.  You can read more about the Homestead Act’s legacy at the website of The Chicago Tribune.

Act of May 20, 1862 (Homestead Act), Public Law 37-64, 05/20/1862; Record Group 11; General Records of the United States Government; National Archives.

Leave a comment

Filed under Lincoln and Memory, Lincoln as President

Take away the war and emancipation, and you’ve still got a consequential presidency

A piece at Investor’s Business Daily looks at Lincoln’s presidency, beyond waging the Civil War and freeing the slaves. Even without these two accomplishments, the historians interviewed for the piece suggest, his administration would have been one of the most significant in America’s history.

Leave a comment

Filed under Lincoln as President

Lincoln and the Homestead Act

This is the anniversary of one of the more important achievements of Lincoln’s presidency.  On May 20, 1862 Lincoln signed into law the Homestead Act, which allowed settlers to claim up to 160 acres of land in the American West.  After improving their claims, paying a small fee, and residing on their land for five years, these settlers received clear title to these farms; farmers could also claim title after only six months by paying $1.25 per acre.

At first glance, the Homestead Act seems to have little to do with the most notable concern of Lincoln’s administration, which was bringing the Civil War to a successful end.  In reality, however, the issues of secession and western settlement were closely linked.  It was the debate over whether slavery could be prohibited in the new lands opening up in the West that brought about the confrontation between North and South.  The new Republican Party, of which Lincoln became a member, was a coalition of groups that opposed the spread of slavery beyond the limits set by the compromises of the early and mid-1800’s.  The election of a Republican to the presidency in 1860 was therefore a threat to the institution’s expansion—and one thing about which opponents and proponents of slavery agreed was that the institution needed to expand in order to survive.  The West was central to the controversy that brought about the Civil War.

The secession of the South was a crisis for opponents of slavery, but it was also an opportunity for those who wanted a West for free white farmers instead of slave owners.  With the South out of the way, free-soil politicians were free to establish western settlement in the way they had always wanted, as a haven for free white labor instead of territory in which slavery could expand further.  The Homestead Act represented the kind of western settlement which Republicans like Lincoln had advocated in the 1850’s, a frontier which did not include the peculiar institution.  It helped set the stage for the explosive growth of the West once victory in the war had been secured.

In that sense, secession was a strategic blunder by proponents of slavery.  By removing themselves from the theater of national politics, the secessionists allowed free-soil politicians to establish a West that fit their vision of America’s future—the same vision for which Lincoln argued when he walked onto the national stage in his debates with Douglas.

Leave a comment

Filed under Lincoln as President